So, this is it, after two semesters of blogging it looks like this is the last time I will be required to update this blog. So here goes...the post that I am most proud of from this quarter is...
"The (Insert Issue Here) Cycle"!
This is favorite post from this quarter for a few reasons. First of all, I took a theme that we have been discussing in class (gender discrimination), and I took that further and looked for a link to that topic today, rather than to the 1800s, the setting of the Kentucky Cycle. I found research that had recently been conducted at Cambridge, which talked about that exact subject. I not only learned a lot from the overview of the study, but it also led me to ask for an opinion from my readers. I only got one comment, but it was still very insightful!
Overall, I was pretty happy with my blogging this quarter. I was often at a loss for interesting things to blog about, but I always tried my best to keep my posts interesting. But every time I struggled to think of a topic for a post, it led to me think even more critically about our society, which is the greatest thing that blogging has taught me. This combined with the class has helped make this year so great. I have learned a lot, and I know that I will use the skills that I learned in American Studies throughout the rest of life, so thank you both, Mr. Bolos and Mr. O'Connor, very much for teaching me how to enter into a conversation and think in a way I had never even imagined about society.
Sunday, June 5, 2011
Saturday, June 4, 2011
Remembering Gil Scott Heron
Just last week, poet/musician/author Gil Scott Heron died at the age of 62. He was one of the earliest "rappers", who spoke his mind by putting his anger into song. Since this relates to my junior theme, I figured I would talk about this a little bit.
Living in New York at a time when the inner city was just about the worst place you could be in, Heron was angry at the disparities that existed been whites and blacks as well as upper-class and lower-class. Because of these disparities, many youth in New York resorted to violence as a means of letting out their anger. Heron, however, had a different method. A talented young writer, he put poems and stories to a beat, hoping that somehow they would reach the attention of the world. His songs "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised" and "Whitey on the Moon" are two of the best examples of these themes (and also his most popular).
His music not only became the roots of rap music, but he helped change New York. Because of music like this, kids began to express themselves in rhyme and song rather than using violence. Rap music became an escape for these kids, and, I think Heron would be quite happy to know that these stories have reached a mainstream audience. He started a revolution that not only changed how African-American kids in low-income areas view the world, but also how the world views them.
Living in New York at a time when the inner city was just about the worst place you could be in, Heron was angry at the disparities that existed been whites and blacks as well as upper-class and lower-class. Because of these disparities, many youth in New York resorted to violence as a means of letting out their anger. Heron, however, had a different method. A talented young writer, he put poems and stories to a beat, hoping that somehow they would reach the attention of the world. His songs "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised" and "Whitey on the Moon" are two of the best examples of these themes (and also his most popular).
His music not only became the roots of rap music, but he helped change New York. Because of music like this, kids began to express themselves in rhyme and song rather than using violence. Rap music became an escape for these kids, and, I think Heron would be quite happy to know that these stories have reached a mainstream audience. He started a revolution that not only changed how African-American kids in low-income areas view the world, but also how the world views them.
Thursday, June 2, 2011
Coming Together
As most of you probably already know, a very deadly tornado hit Joplin, Missouri a few weeks ago, killing many people. It was a horrible event, but the events that followed caused me to think about something that seems to happen frequently here in America, and it is very interesting.
It always seems that our society is very separate. The different social classes don't really seem to interact with one another and people just seem very stagnant about where they are in life. However, whenever some sort of disaster happens, people from all classes seem to come together to help one another. In the case of the Joplin tornado, people from other states came to help the Joplin residents clean up and get their lives back in order.
The same thing happened in the days following 9/11. People came together, and the nation really seemed to be one connected country. It didn't matter what class you were from or your background, people respected one another and came together. However, not long after, things went back to the way they were before the events of 9/11 even occurred. I have just been wondering why this happens. People come together for a little bit after a tragic event, but then things go back to the way they are not long after. Is it because classes have a difficult time interacting with one another, and helping each other in times of need is their only true way of interacting and they feel that it is nice to help? I am really not sure.
It always seems that our society is very separate. The different social classes don't really seem to interact with one another and people just seem very stagnant about where they are in life. However, whenever some sort of disaster happens, people from all classes seem to come together to help one another. In the case of the Joplin tornado, people from other states came to help the Joplin residents clean up and get their lives back in order.
The same thing happened in the days following 9/11. People came together, and the nation really seemed to be one connected country. It didn't matter what class you were from or your background, people respected one another and came together. However, not long after, things went back to the way they were before the events of 9/11 even occurred. I have just been wondering why this happens. People come together for a little bit after a tragic event, but then things go back to the way they are not long after. Is it because classes have a difficult time interacting with one another, and helping each other in times of need is their only true way of interacting and they feel that it is nice to help? I am really not sure.
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
The (Insert Issue Here) Cycle
Currently in American Studies we are reading a series of plays called "The Kentucky Cycle". Each play takes place on the same plot of land in Kentucky, and the play discusses how society has changed over time. I began thinking (not just because our final paper is about this i promise) about whether our society actually has progressed over the years or whether it is just a myth that we as Americans subscribe to. I did some quick research on modern-day gender relations. I know that in the past women were expected to work at home, get paid less if they did work, and everything like that, however I was quite surprised to find out about what is going on in modern times.
A quick search brought me to the University of Cambridge, where they are doing a study on just this subject. In the article it states that while there has been a general change in how males and females are viewed in society, some things have stayed the same. For example, women no longer are expected to work at home, and many of them are working the same jobs that men would have previously been expected to work. However, women are still being payed less than men overall. Why is this? I am really not sure. I can a guess though, and that is that our society is used to thinking of women as less than men. Even though we think that many things change in our society, it seems that some states of mind never do. Because we still think of men as the prominent workers in a family, it seems right in our minds that they should get payed more.
Looks like it is a cycle after all. But that's just my opinion. How about the rest of you, do you subscribe to the myth?
A quick search brought me to the University of Cambridge, where they are doing a study on just this subject. In the article it states that while there has been a general change in how males and females are viewed in society, some things have stayed the same. For example, women no longer are expected to work at home, and many of them are working the same jobs that men would have previously been expected to work. However, women are still being payed less than men overall. Why is this? I am really not sure. I can a guess though, and that is that our society is used to thinking of women as less than men. Even though we think that many things change in our society, it seems that some states of mind never do. Because we still think of men as the prominent workers in a family, it seems right in our minds that they should get payed more.
Looks like it is a cycle after all. But that's just my opinion. How about the rest of you, do you subscribe to the myth?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)